Life History

Notes

• Two children named Michael were reported by this source in thisfamily.  This is a common event in the 1880s, and there are separatedates given for each.  However, there were some suspicious detailsthat made me suspect there was something wrong here.
  
  The second Michael was given a different birth year, but was reportedas dying the next year -- the same year the first Michael died.  Thiswas a further problem because there was another child born both theprevious year and a set of twins born the same year reported for thebirth of the second Michael.
  
  I conclude that this was an erroneous entry, and there should be onlyone Michael in this family.